What a trust center is
The page agencies check instead of emailing you โ and the reason a compliance page without a timestamp is worth nothing.
Every agency evaluating a cloud service asks the same questions, and today most providers answer them by hand: an email thread, a package attached to a reply, a spreadsheet updated when someone remembers. A trust center is that answer, published once and kept current automatically.
What belongs on one
- Authorization status, live. Type, path and impact class, reflecting what is true now rather than at the last assessment.
- Automated-check coverage. What share of your requirements is verified continuously against infrastructure, not asserted in prose.
- Authorization documents, gated your way. Some documents are public, some need an NDA. Both should be visible; only one should be downloadable.
- Vulnerability posture. Current, against the remediation timeframes the rules impose.
- A timestamp. "Last evaluated" is what turns a page into evidence. A trust center with no date is a brochure.
Why the timestamp is the whole thing
A static compliance page ages into a liability. It keeps saying you are compliant after the drift that broke it, and the first person to notice is an assessor or an agency. A trust center is only worth publishing if something keeps it honest โ evidence collected on a schedule, checks run against live infrastructure, and a visible evaluation time an agency can judge for itself.
Common questions
What is a FedRAMP trust center?
A public page that publishes a cloud service provider's current FedRAMP authorization status, the documents an agency may request, and evidence that the provider's security posture is current โ so agencies can verify it themselves instead of emailing for a package.
Is a trust center required by FedRAMP?
No. FedRAMP requires the underlying posture and reporting, not a public page. A trust center is how providers cut the cost of proving it repeatedly to every agency and prospect that asks.
What should a trust center contain?
Current authorization status and type, the impact class and path, authorization documents with the ones requiring an NDA gated rather than hidden, current vulnerability posture, automated-check coverage, and a timestamp showing when it was last evaluated.
Where to start
Work out which requirements apply to you, check when they bite, and see which of them can be verified without a human in the loop. Zenibit publishes the result as a trust center on your behalf; the parts you would have to build yourself are the collection and the schedule, not the page.
Stop assembling this by hand.
Zenibit tracks these requirements against your live infrastructure and publishes a trust center agencies can verify themselves. Get in touch.